Nigeria Leagues

NFF Board approves evaluation report and sanctions meted by Referees Committee

Published

2 years ago

11:33 am

NFF Board approves evaluation report and sanctions meted by Referees Committee

The Board of the Nigeria Soccer Federation has endorsed the primary analysis report, together with sanctions, meted out to erring officers by the Federation’s Referees Committee headed by Mrs Religion Irabor.

It might be recalled that through the inauguration of the NFF Referees Committee, the President, Alhaji Ibrahim Musa Gusau had implored them to be of excellent character and to stay as much as the ethics of their career.

As an additional step, Alhaji Gusau had handed the Basic Secretary, Dr Mohammed Sanusi the duty of at all times placing a name by way of to all referees on arrival at their task venues, to remind them to discharge their duties effectively and concerning the sanctity of constancy to the legal guidelines of the sport.

Regardless of these exhortations and reminders, just a few officers had did not abide by the foundations and laws, failed the diligence check and have accordingly been sanctioned by the Referees Committee. These sanctions have now been authorized by the NFF Board.

a. NPFL Matches:

1. Wikki Vacationers FC vs Niger Tornadoes FC:
Madu Endurance Ndidi (FIFA), Enugu; Referee.

It was recognized that an incident occurred within the penalty space, which she whistled and signaled for a penalty kick and immediately modified her resolution for a purpose because the ball ultimately proceeded and resulted in a purpose.

After thorough evaluation, it was concluded that:

i. A Foul was dedicated and the Referee signaled for a Penalty Kick;

ii. That the purpose resulted from a useless ball, and subsequently, the benefit clause just isn’t relevant on this instantaneous scenario;

iii. That the Referee ought to have maintained her resolution of penalty kick;

iv. That she dedicated an error of judgment in permitting the purpose.

Choice: She is warned and suggested to at all times take into account the bigger image by acceptable scanning and delay resolution till there’s a clear certainty to justify a choice.

2. Capturing Stars Sports activities Membership vs Kwara United FC:
Ukah Ndubuisi (FIFA), Imo, Referee Otuwho Morrison, Delta, Assistant Referee 2

It was noticed that in a build-up, which resulted in a purpose, the AR 2, Otuwho Morrison signaled to penalized the scorer for an offside offense. The Referee complied along with his AR to disallowed the purpose.

After correct examination of the clip, it was inferred that:

i. As on the time the ball leaves the leg of the kicker (teammate of the scorer), the scorer was not in an offside place;

ii. The AR2 was not correctly positioned to justify the choice to penalize the scorer for offside offense.

Choice: The Referee is warned and suggested to enhance on his performances because the obligation to determine/set up offside place is only that of the AR;

The AR2, Otuwho Morrison is to be stand down from the league

3. Rivers United vs Niger Tornadoes

Faro Abdulrahman, Lagos, Referee

The committee famous that after a nook kick was taken, the ball traveled into the penalty space with the defending goalkeeper popping out and tried to parry the ball away, which he missed and an attacking participant kicked the ball and scored. The Referee signaled for an infringement to disallowed the purpose.

The committee explored the video clip completely to noticed that:

i. There was no unlawful contact that would translate right into a foul by the attacking workforce;

ii. The choice of the Referee to disallowed the purpose just isn’t inside the provisions of the Legal guidelines of the sport, and subsequently, unjustified.

Choice: The Referee, Faro Abdulrahman is to be stand-down from the league

b. NWFL Matches

Although, Match Officers’ choices in one of many NWFL matches (Rivers Angels vs Delta Queens) was characterised by controversial/questionable choices that had opposed results on the result of the match, the committee nonetheless thought of the that the impression of the selections of Match Officers within the different reviewed matches weren’t severe sufficient to warrant punitive measures.

1. Rivers Angels vs Delta Queens
Adesola Olufunke, Oyo, Referee Abdulrasheed Rofiat, Oyo, Assistant Referee 1 Aladenika Adetutu Assistant Referee 2

The committee noticed that two targets of Delta Queens had been disallowed by the Referee, Adesola Olufunke and her lively Assistant Referee 1, Abdulrasheed Rofiat.

The committee famous that:

i. In an assault in direction of the penalty space of Rivers Angels, the defending participant tried a scissors kick and missed the ball;

ii. Not one of the two attacking gamers in shut proximity to the defending participant dedicated no offense;

iii. The declare of the Referee that there was a foul/pushing is unfounded and subsequently, her resolution to disallowed the purpose unjustified with the Legal guidelines of the Sport.

Choice: Referee Adesola Olufunke is to be stand-down from the league

The second purpose disallowed by the Assistant Referee’s sign for an offside is taken into account as justified because the committee noticed a doable offside scenario within the run in direction of the

purpose by the attacking gamers. The Assistant Referees are nonetheless, warned and suggested to enhance of their performances

2. Osun Babes vs Delta Queens

Ogunboye Pleasure, Ondo, Referee

Olusi Kikelomo, Ondo, Assistant Referee 1 Ajirotutu Esther, Ondo, Assistant Referee 2

The committee famous that the incidences and errors of judgment of the Match Officers weren’t severe sufficient to warrant punitive measures.

Choice: The three (3) Match Officers are warned and suggested to enhance of their performances.

3. Adamawa Queens vs Nasarawa Amazons

Paul Beatrice, Taraba, Referee

Elizabeth Yunusa, Gombe, Assistant Referee 1 Wuriba Biwuli Ruth, Plateau, Assistant Referee 2

The committee noticed that the incidences and errors of judgment of the Match Officers weren’t severe sufficient to warrant punitive measures.

Choice: The three (3) Match Officers are warned and suggested to enhance of their

performances.